There was a great staff editorial posted in the Wall Street Journal today. The column discussed the 2.9% Medicare tax (called a Medicare payroll levy in this column) being applied to passive income -- which includes incomes such as interest, dividends, rents, etc.
As you may or may not know, each taxpayer that receives a W-2 has 1.45% of their gross income set aside for Medicare. The employer which furnished a W-2 to its employees likewise pay 1.45% of the gross income to Medicare. Both of these amounts combine for the 2.9% that is sent to the IRS.
The 2.9% is only taken from total wages, not other types of income. This proposal would change that... and since passive income is typically not automatically withheld by employers, would cause additional strain on young individuals filling out their tax returns.
Here's the link to the editorial:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704188104575083520811873704.html
I agree with most elements of the staff editorial. I think that several key contradictions that exist in the Health Care Reform bills are accurately pointed out, such as as the hike on capital gains tax through the 2.9% Medicare payroll levy on passive income. The article does not quite mention the burden on young taxpayers filing returns, but I identify this consequence as another negative by-product of this type of legislation.
It serves as another good reason why young people need to have a unified voice when it comes to defining the legislation that will impact our generation for many years to come.
Once again, look at this issue as a reason why Mass Tax-ed is here -- the voice of a younger generation when it comes to individual tax matters.